Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults: An overview of 46 systematic reviews.

AIMS: To summarize the evidence from systematic reviews (SRs) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors versus placebo or active comparators for type 2 diabetes mellitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched six databases between 2014 and 2021. We assessed the quality of evidence using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR 2) and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and summarized the main outcome results according to their evidence of benefit (PROSPERO ID: CRD42019132431). RESULTS: We included 46 SRs, comprising 175 RCTs and 136 096 participants. The results showed "clear evidence of benefit" in relation to: myocardial infarction (odds ratio [OR]/hazard ratio [HR] 0.85 to 0.91); cardiovascular mortality (OR/HR 0.67 to 0.86); heart failure (OR/HR 0.64 to 0.69); albuminuria progression and composite renal outcome (relative risk [RR]/HR 0.55 to 0.63); glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) versus placebo (mean difference [MD] -0.49% to -0.77% [5.4 to 8.4 mmol/mol]); and weight versus placebo (MD -1.09 kg to -2.99 kg). "Possible benefit" was observed in relation to major adverse cardiovascular events (OR/HR 0.80 to 0.89), all-cause mortality and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. SGLT2 inhibitors showed "clear evidence of no effect or equivalence" in relation to stroke and fractures. "Clear evidence of harm" was observed in relation to genital infections (RR/OR 2.06 to 5.25) and ketoacidosis (HR/OR 1.36 to 2.20). Regarding amputation risk and urinary tract infections, we found "no conclusions possible due to lack of evidence". CONCLUSIONS: Our results showed that SGLT2 inhibitors have beneficial effects in relation to renal and cardiovascular outcomes (except for stroke), HbA1c and weight. Further studies are needed to assess urinary infections and amputation risk.

Continuous glucose monitoring system: dawn period calibration does not change accuracy of the method.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous glucose monitoring system is a valuable instrument to measure glycemic control, which uses a retrospective calibration based upon 3 to 4 capillary glucose meter values inserted by the patient each day. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the interference of calibration during the dawn period in the system accuracy. METHODS: The monitoring data were retrospectively divided into two groups: with (Group A) or without (Group B) the dawn period calibration (between 1:00 and 5:00 AM). Accuracy of the method was expressed by relative absolute difference. RESULTS: Thirty-four continuous glucose monitoring data were evaluated comprising a total of 112 nights. A total of 289 paired readings were analyzed - 195 in Group A and 94 in Group B. We did not find a difference in relative absolute difference (RAD%) in any analyzed period of day by adding dawn calibration. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that dawn calibration does not alter accuracy of method.

Continuous glucose monitoring system: dawn period calibration does not change accuracy of the method / Sistema de monitorização contínua de glicose: calibração da madrugada não interfere na acurácia do método

INTRODUCTION: Continuous glucose monitoring system is a valuable instrument to measure glycemic control, which uses a retrospective calibration based upon 3 to 4 capillary glucose meter values inserted by the patient each day. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the interference of calibration during the dawn period in the system accuracy. METHODS: The monitoring data were retrospectively divided into two groups: with (Group A) or without (Group B) the dawn period calibration (between 1:00 and 5:00 AM). Accuracy of the method was expressed by relative absolute difference. RESULTS: Thirty-four continuous glucose monitoring data were evaluated comprising a total of 112 nights. A total of 289 paired readings were analyzed - 195 in Group A and 94 in Group B. We did not find a difference in relative absolute difference (RAD%) in any analyzed period of day by adding dawn calibration. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that dawn calibration does not alter accuracy of method.

INTRODUÇÃO: O CGMS (sigla do inglês continuous glucose monitoring system) é um instrumento valioso no controle glicêmico e utiliza uma calibração por meio de 3 ou 4 medidas de glicemia capilar inseridas pelo paciente em cada dia do exame. OBJETIVO: Avaliar a interferência da calibração durante a madrugada na acurácia do sistema. MÉTODOS: Os dados das monitorizações foram divididos retrospectivamente em dois grupos: com (Grupo A) ou sem (Grupo B) a calibração da madrugada (entre 1:00 e 5:00 AM). A acurácia do método foi mostrada pela diferença relativa absoluta (DRA por cento). RESULTADOS: Trinta e quarto dados de monitorização foram avaliados em um total de 112 noites. Um total de 289 leituras pareadas foi analisado - 195 no Grupo A e 94 no Grupo B. Não foi encontrada diferença em DRA% em nenhum período do dia quando adicionada a calibração durante a madrugada. CONCLUSÕES: Esses dados sugerem que a calibração da madrugada não altera a acurácia do método.